Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Kardium Inc.

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

5 pending office actions • 2 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 8 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Kardium Inc. has 7 pending office actions in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering. The portfolio involves 5 distinct examiners across 2 distinct art units, indicating that several examiners are working within a relatively concentrated examination-group structure.

GEDEON, BRIAN T is the busiest examiner, with 2 pending matters. That assignment provides some examiner continuity, although the remaining applications require coordination across other examiners.

The limited art-unit spread may support technical alignment across applications, especially where claim themes overlap. Counsel should still distinguish examiner-specific objections and preserve a clear record explaining why related amendments are appropriate in each matter.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (40%)
2
Medium (40%)
1
Easy (20%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (20%)
§103 only1 (20%)
§102 only1 (20%)
§112 only1 (20%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (20%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
GEDEON, BRIAN T 2 87.0% +7.2%
BOCK, ABIGAIL MARIE 1 91.0% +7.3%
GOOD, SAMANTHA M 1 68.3% +10.9%
BORSCH, NICHOLAS S 1 73.1% +12.5%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19058354 MEDICAL SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR FAULT-TOLERANT TISSUE ABLATION BOCK, ABIGAIL MARIE —
18982381 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SELECTING, ACTIVATING, OR SELECTING AND ACTIVATING TRANSDUCERS GEDEON, BRIAN T —

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18982251 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SELECTING, ACTIVATING, OR SELECTING AND ACTIVATING TRANSDUCERS GEDEON, BRIAN T —
17885990 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TREATING TISSUE BASED ON NAVIGATION INFORMATION BORSCH, NICHOLAS S —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18308000 SYSTEMS AND METHODS THAT FACILITATE TISSUE TREATMENT BASED ON PROXIMITY INFORMATION GOOD, SAMANTHA M 20d
17885990 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TREATING TISSUE BASED ON NAVIGATION INFORMATION BORSCH, NICHOLAS S —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3794 3
3796 2

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19058354 MEDICAL SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR FAULT-TOLERANT TISSUE ABLATION BOCK, ABIGAIL MARIE 3794 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 20, 2025
18982381 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SELECTING, ACTIVATING, OR SELECTING AND ACTIVATING TRANSDUCERS GEDEON, BRIAN T 3796 §102Other Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 16, 2024
18982251 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SELECTING, ACTIVATING, OR SELECTING AND ACTIVATING TRANSDUCERS GEDEON, BRIAN T 3796 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 16, 2024
18308000 SYSTEMS AND METHODS THAT FACILITATE TISSUE TREATMENT BASED ON PROXIMITY INFORMATION GOOD, SAMANTHA M 3794 §112 Final Rejection 20d Pending Apr 27, 2023
17885990 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TREATING TISSUE BASED ON NAVIGATION INFORMATION BORSCH, NICHOLAS S 3794 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 11, 2022

Managing Kardium Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Kardium Inc. have?

Kardium Inc. has 5 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 4 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Kardium Inc. applications?

Brian T Gedeon has the most, with 2 of Kardium Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Kardium Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month