Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Karsun Enterprises Inc. maintains 1 pending office action located in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. Prosecution is currently limited to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, reflecting a point of contact with the patent office. This concentration means the portfolio's immediate progress depends on the specific requirements of the 1 distinct art unit. For practitioners, this narrow focus allows for a specialized response strategy tailored to the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering area.
ATTEL, NINA KAY serves as the busiest examiner, holding 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Since this 1 pending office action represents the total volume for the company, the personal prosecution style of ATTEL, NINA KAY is the primary factor for the portfolio's current trajectory. The alignment of 1 distinct examiner with 1 pending office action ensures that no conflicting examiner preferences are currently impacting the company's strategy. This environment in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering area suggests that the company's current intellectual property efforts are highly targeted.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATTEL, NINA KAY | 1 | 41.4% | +27.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19057733 | STRUCTURED BAG WITH STRUCTURED CLOSURE | ATTEL, NINA KAY | 35d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19057733 | STRUCTURED BAG WITH STRUCTURED CLOSURE | ATTEL, NINA KAY | 35d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3734 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19057733 | STRUCTURED BAG WITH STRUCTURED CLOSURE | ATTEL, NINA KAY | 3734 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | 35d | Pending | Feb 19, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial