Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Kas Pet LLC has 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The prosecution activity is currently limited to a distinct examiner working within 1 distinct art unit. This indicates a singular point of contact for the company's pending intellectual property matters, which simplifies the administrative tracking of the portfolio.
The busiest examiner identified is GOFF II, JOHN L, who is assigned 1 pending office action. Because there is only a single examiner for the portfolio, this individual manages all current office action responses. The presence of a distinct art unit suggests the pending application falls within a specific technical niche in the chemistry field, requiring specialized knowledge from the examiner.
With the pending office action currently active, the company's engagement with the patent office is highly focused. GOFF II, JOHN L is the primary official overseeing this matter, and the results from the Chemistry & Materials technology area will be critical for the portfolio. This concentrated activity allows for a dedicated response strategy tailored to the specific requirements of the assigned examiner.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GOFF II, JOHN L | 1 | 59.5% | +31.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19025064 | COMPOSITIONS AND METHOD OF MAKING PH INDICATING NONWOVEN MATERIAL AND ABSORBENT PAD | GOFF II, JOHN L | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19025064 | COMPOSITIONS AND METHOD OF MAKING PH INDICATING NONWOVEN MATERIAL AND ABSORBENT PAD | GOFF II, JOHN L | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1746 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19025064 | COMPOSITIONS AND METHOD OF MAKING PH INDICATING NONWOVEN MATERIAL AND ABSORBENT PAD | GOFF II, JOHN L | 1746 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 16, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial