Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Katrick Technologies Limited currently maintains 1 pending office action within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. This active matter is located in a distinct art unit, suggesting a specialized focus on a particular aspect of electronic or optical hardware. The prosecution is being handled by 1 distinct examiner, which streamlines the communication process between the applicant and the patent office. This focused approach is typical for portfolios with limited active filings, where the goal is to resolve the outstanding matter efficiently through a single point of contact.
MIKAILOFF, STEFAN is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, with 1 pending office action under their review. As this is the only pending action for Katrick Technologies Limited, the examiner's individual interpretation of the prior art and patentability will be the primary factor in the application's outcome. This single-examiner environment allows for a focused prosecution strategy without the need to reconcile different examiner viewpoints. Practitioners should prioritize a clear and direct dialogue with MIKAILOFF, STEFAN to address any technical rejections or prior art concerns raised in the 1 distinct art unit.
The presence of a distinct art unit in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics field implies that the technology is being evaluated by a specific group of technical experts. Because there is only 1 pending office action, the practitioner can focus exclusively on the issues raised by the assigned examiner. This concentrated effort is beneficial for ensuring a thorough and effective response to the patent office's requirements. Success in this matter will secure the company's position in the electronic hardware sector and provide a foundation for future innovation.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §112 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MIKAILOFF, STEFAN | 1 | 42.7% | +29.1% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18550091 | Energy Harvesting Device, System and Method of Manufacture | MIKAILOFF, STEFAN | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2834 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18550091 | Energy Harvesting Device, System and Method of Manufacture | MIKAILOFF, STEFAN | 2834 | §112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Sep 11, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial