Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Kcc Glass Corporation

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Kcc Glass Corporation has 2 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These are distributed between 2 distinct examiners across 2 distinct art units. This means that each of the 2 pending office actions is being reviewed by a different examiner. This lack of overlap requires a tailored approach for each of the 2 pending office actions.

KELLY, CATHERINE A is the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action. With 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units, the company's current transportation portfolio is split between two different technical divisions. This distribution requires managing two independent prosecution tracks for its mechanical innovations. The absence of concentration under a single examiner means that the company must adapt to two different sets of examination styles. Each of the 2 pending office actions represents a separate technical challenge in the glass and transportation sector. The company's current success depends on navigating these 2 distinct art units effectively.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
50% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KELLY, CATHERINE A 1 60.4% +27.5%
FERGUSON, LAWRENCE D 1 78.5% +13.0%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18949642 FLUSH VEHICLE DOOR HAVING A DETACHABLE SLIDER FIXING RAIL AND A METHOD OF ASSEMBLING A FLUSH DOOR KELLY, CATHERINE A 9d
18902249 VEHICLE GLASS HAVING A THREE-DIMENSIONAL PATTERN FERGUSON, LAWRENCE D —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18949642 FLUSH VEHICLE DOOR HAVING A DETACHABLE SLIDER FIXING RAIL AND A METHOD OF ASSEMBLING A FLUSH DOOR KELLY, CATHERINE A 9d
18902249 VEHICLE GLASS HAVING A THREE-DIMENSIONAL PATTERN FERGUSON, LAWRENCE D —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3619 1
1781 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18949642 FLUSH VEHICLE DOOR HAVING A DETACHABLE SLIDER FIXING RAIL AND A METHOD OF ASSEMBLING A FLUSH DOOR KELLY, CATHERINE A 3619 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 9d Pending Nov 15, 2024
18902249 VEHICLE GLASS HAVING A THREE-DIMENSIONAL PATTERN FERGUSON, LAWRENCE D 1781 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 30, 2024

Managing Kcc Glass Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Kcc Glass Corporation have?

Kcc Glass Corporation has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Kcc Glass Corporation applications?

Catherine A Kelly has the most, with 1 of Kcc Glass Corporation's pending office actions.

What technology area are Kcc Glass Corporation's patent applications in?

Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month