Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Keiper Seating Mechanisms Co. Ltd. has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, ISLAM, SYED A, who is the busiest examiner for the company with 1 pending action. The matter is classified within 1 distinct art unit. This indicates a very small and concentrated prosecution presence at the patent office.
With only 1 pending office action, the company's current workload is minimal. ISLAM, SYED A is the only distinct examiner involved, making him the sole point of contact for the company's active matters. The 1 distinct art unit suggests that the technology is focused on a specific mechanical or transportation-related classification.
Practitioners will find that this portfolio requires very little coordination across different examiners or art units. The 1 pending office action is the only active file, and ISLAM, SYED A is the only examiner to manage. The 1 distinct art unit defines the technical boundaries of the current prosecution, requiring a deep understanding of that specific classification within Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISLAM, SYED A | 1 | 67.9% | +22.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18867340 | SMALL CONTINUOUS ANGLE ADJUSTER | ISLAM, SYED A | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18867340 | SMALL CONTINUOUS ANGLE ADJUSTER | ISLAM, SYED A | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3636 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18867340 | SMALL CONTINUOUS ANGLE ADJUSTER | ISLAM, SYED A | 3636 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 19, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial