Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Kemira Oyj

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

7 pending office actions • 5 art units • 7 examiners • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 23 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Kemira Oyj has 7 pending office actions in Chemistry & Materials. The matters involve 7 distinct examiners and 5 distinct art units, indicating broad examiner coverage with repeated art-unit assignments.

MINSKEY, JACOB T is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending matter. Portfolio review can use shared art-unit context to identify recurring technical issues while retaining separate examiner-focused responses.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

6
Hard (86%)
1
Medium (14%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (29%)
§103 only1 (14%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (57%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

6
Life Sciences
86% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
14% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MINSKEY, JACOB T 1 69.2% +33.1%
VERA, ELISA H 1 72.4% +26.3%
PERRIN, CLARE M 1 68.3% +42.6%
BREWSTER, HAYDEN R 1 62.8% +46.8%
GURTOWSKI, RICHARD C 1 72.3% +37.8%
TUCKER, PHILIP C 1 26.4% +15.7%
FIORITO, JAMES A 1 71.6% +28.0%

Hard Cases (6)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18875193 Biocide control in paper making MINSKEY, JACOB T —
18874116 Method for controlling a process in making pulp, paper, or board VERA, ELISA H —
18722120 ANTIMICROBIAL SYSTEM AND METHOD PERRIN, CLARE M —
18721670 A METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MONITORING BIOSLUDGE QUALITY IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT BREWSTER, HAYDEN R —
18695041 A METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CONTROLLING A COAGULANT DOSAGE IN A WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM GURTOWSKI, RICHARD C —
18562131 FRACTURING METHODS USING TAGGED POLYMERS TUCKER, PHILIP C —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18875193 Biocide control in paper making MINSKEY, JACOB T —
18874116 Method for controlling a process in making pulp, paper, or board VERA, ELISA H —
18722120 ANTIMICROBIAL SYSTEM AND METHOD PERRIN, CLARE M —
18721670 A METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MONITORING BIOSLUDGE QUALITY IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT BREWSTER, HAYDEN R —
18695041 A METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CONTROLLING A COAGULANT DOSAGE IN A WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM GURTOWSKI, RICHARD C —
18562131 FRACTURING METHODS USING TAGGED POLYMERS TUCKER, PHILIP C —
18036987 METHOD FOR PRODUCING COAGULANT ALUMINIUM SALTS FIORITO, JAMES A —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1748 2
1779 1
1773 1
1745 1
1731 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18875193 Biocide control in paper making MINSKEY, JACOB T 1748 §101§102§103§112DP Final Rejection — Pending Dec 16, 2024
18874116 Method for controlling a process in making pulp, paper, or board VERA, ELISA H 1748 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 12, 2024
18722120 ANTIMICROBIAL SYSTEM AND METHOD PERRIN, CLARE M 1779 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 20, 2024
18721670 A METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MONITORING BIOSLUDGE QUALITY IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT BREWSTER, HAYDEN R — §101§102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 19, 2024
18695041 A METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CONTROLLING A COAGULANT DOSAGE IN A WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM GURTOWSKI, RICHARD C 1773 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 25, 2024
18562131 FRACTURING METHODS USING TAGGED POLYMERS TUCKER, PHILIP C 1745 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 17, 2023
18036987 METHOD FOR PRODUCING COAGULANT ALUMINIUM SALTS FIORITO, JAMES A 1731 §103 Final Rejection — Pending May 15, 2023

Managing Kemira Oyj's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Kemira Oyj have?

Kemira Oyj has 7 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 5 art units and 7 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Kemira Oyj applications?

Jacob T Minskey has the most, with 1 of Kemira Oyj's pending office actions.

What technology area are Kemira Oyj's patent applications in?

Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month