Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Kenneth Moden currently has 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This activity is localized within 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, representing a singular focus for the portfolio's current prosecution. The Chemistry & Materials area covers a wide range of substances, and the assignment to 1 distinct art unit suggests a specific technical application for the pending matter.
FELTON, AILEEN BAKER is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, managing 1 pending. Because this examiner is the only one currently engaged with the applicant's pending matters, the outcome of the prosecution depends on the specific findings and procedural requirements of this individual. This lack of examiner diversity allows for a very targeted and consistent response strategy within the Chemistry & Materials technology area.
The presence of 1 pending office action means that there are no competing deadlines or conflicting examiner requirements to manage. The use of 1 distinct art unit allows the applicant to focus on the specific prior art and examination trends that are prevalent in that unit. Practitioners should review the specific objections raised by FELTON, AILEEN BAKER to ensure that the response is tailored to the examiner's identified concerns.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| FELTON, AILEEN BAKER | 1 | 51.7% | +16.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18053567 | MONOPROPELLANT HYDROGEN PEROXIDE FUEL COMPOSITIONS SUITABLE FOR USE IN NO OXYGEN ENVIRONMENTS | FELTON, AILEEN BAKER | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18053567 | MONOPROPELLANT HYDROGEN PEROXIDE FUEL COMPOSITIONS SUITABLE FOR USE IN NO OXYGEN ENVIRONMENTS | FELTON, AILEEN BAKER | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1734 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18053567 | MONOPROPELLANT HYDROGEN PEROXIDE FUEL COMPOSITIONS SUITABLE FOR USE IN NO OXYGEN ENVIRONMENTS | FELTON, AILEEN BAKER | 1734 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 08, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialKenneth Moden has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Aileen Baker Felton has the most, with 1 of Kenneth Moden's pending office actions.
Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
