Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Kimpex Inc.

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

3 pending office actions • 1 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Kimpex Inc. currently manages 3 pending office actions within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These matters are handled by 3 distinct examiners, which indicates that each action is being reviewed by a different professional. The portfolio is concentrated within 1 distinct art unit, suggesting a focused technical review process for the company's current patent applications.

The examiner MORAN, KATHERINE M is responsible for 1 pending office action. As one of the 3 distinct examiners involved, this individual handles a portion of the company's current workload at the patent office. Practitioners should tailor their prosecution strategy to the specific preferences of each examiner while maintaining a consistent technical approach within the 1 distinct art unit.

The distribution of 3 pending office actions within a single art unit allows the legal team to focus on a specific set of procedural standards. Because there are 3 distinct examiners, the company must manage three different examination styles. Success in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering area depends on meeting the requirements of the assigned art unit and the 1 action assigned to MORAN, KATHERINE M.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
0
Medium (0%)
1
Easy (33%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§112 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MORAN, KATHERINE M 1 54.3% +24.2%
PIERORAZIO, JILLIAN KUTCH 1 59.3% +32.1%
DUCKWORTH, BRIANNA T 1 44.9% +45.7%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18109620 HELMET LINER ASSEMBLY DUCKWORTH, BRIANNA T 28d
19531280 HELMET WITH AERODYNAMIC PEAK MORAN, KATHERINE M —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18109620 HELMET LINER ASSEMBLY DUCKWORTH, BRIANNA T 28d
19531280 HELMET WITH AERODYNAMIC PEAK MORAN, KATHERINE M —
19400561 VISOR ASSEMBLY WITH UNIQUE PLATE PIERORAZIO, JILLIAN KUTCH —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3732 3

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19531280 HELMET WITH AERODYNAMIC PEAK MORAN, KATHERINE M 3732 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 05, 2026
19400561 VISOR ASSEMBLY WITH UNIQUE PLATE PIERORAZIO, JILLIAN KUTCH 3732 §112 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 25, 2025
18109620 HELMET LINER ASSEMBLY DUCKWORTH, BRIANNA T 3732 §103§112 Final Rejection 28d Pending Feb 14, 2023

Managing Kimpex Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Kimpex Inc. have?

Kimpex Inc. has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 3 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Kimpex Inc. applications?

Katherine M Moran has the most, with 1 of Kimpex Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Kimpex Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month