Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Kinetic Telemetry LLC is currently prosecuting a portfolio in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The company has 1 pending office action, which represents the total active workload for its patent filings. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, indicating that the applicant is interacting with only one official at this time. The portfolio is also confined to 1 distinct art unit, which suggests that the pending technology is focused within a single specialized division of the patent office rather than spanning multiple engineering categories.
The busiest examiner for this company is ZAMAN, SADARUZ, who is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Because this individual manages the 1 pending office action, the entire active prosecution is centralized under their review. This concentration in 1 distinct art unit under 1 distinct examiner means that the company's current patent strategy is highly dependent on the specific feedback of this one official. For a practitioner, this profile shows a lack of diversity in examiners and art units, requiring a focused response to the requirements of the single examiner. The presence of active filings in only one area simplifies the management of the company's intellectual property at this stage.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZAMAN, SADARUZ | 1 | 45.6% | +33.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17856204 | IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF MOVEMENT USING SENSOR DEVICES | ZAMAN, SADARUZ | 20d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17856204 | IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF MOVEMENT USING SENSOR DEVICES | ZAMAN, SADARUZ | 20d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3715 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17856204 | IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF MOVEMENT USING SENSOR DEVICES | ZAMAN, SADARUZ | 3715 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | 20d | Pending | Jul 01, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial