Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology currently manages 1 pending office action within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. This single active matter indicates a specific focus in its current USPTO activity. The case is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, which ensures a centralized point of contact for the applicant during the prosecution process.
The prosecution is situated within 1 distinct art unit. This concentration suggests that the technology is highly specialized within the biotechnology sector. Because the portfolio is limited to 1 distinct art unit, the practitioner can focus on the specific examination standards and precedents relevant to that particular department.
JARRELL, NOBLE E is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, currently responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action. As the sole examiner involved in the company's current prosecution, JARRELL, NOBLE E will have a significant impact on the eventual allowance or rejection of the claims.
With 1 pending office action, the prosecution strategy can be highly targeted. The practitioner can devote all necessary resources to addressing the specific concerns of JARRELL, NOBLE E. This streamlined environment is conducive to a thorough and focused response to any office actions issued in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals area.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| JARRELL, NOBLE E | 1 | 81.1% | +9.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18465749 | HIERARCHICAL NANOPOROUS DIAMONDOID SUPERSTRUCTURE | JARRELL, NOBLE E | 22d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1699 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18465749 | HIERARCHICAL NANOPOROUS DIAMONDOID SUPERSTRUCTURE | JARRELL, NOBLE E | 1699 | §102§112Other | Non-Final OA | 22d | Pending | Sep 12, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial