Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
King Point Enterprise Co. Ltd. has 2 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are split between 2 distinct art units, suggesting that the company's innovations in this field are being reviewed by different specialized groups. The involvement of 2 distinct art units for only 2 pending actions indicates a lack of procedural concentration in the current portfolio.
The portfolio involves 2 distinct examiners, with AKARAGWE, YANICK A identified as the busiest examiner. This examiner is responsible for 1 pending office action. Since there are 2 distinct examiners for 2 pending office actions, each matter requires a unique approach tailored to the individual examiner. The prosecution team must navigate the specific requirements of 2 distinct art units while addressing the feedback from 2 different examiners to move the portfolio forward.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| AKARAGWE, YANICK A | 1 | 83.5% | +11.9% |
| MILLER, WILLIAM L | 1 | 79.0% | +14.9% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18965446 | RIVET ASSEMBLY | AKARAGWE, YANICK A | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18937785 | CLAW-TYPE RIVET-PULLING TOOL | MILLER, WILLIAM L | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18965446 | RIVET ASSEMBLY | AKARAGWE, YANICK A | — |
| 18937785 | CLAW-TYPE RIVET-PULLING TOOL | MILLER, WILLIAM L | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3672 | 1 |
| 3677 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18965446 | RIVET ASSEMBLY | AKARAGWE, YANICK A | 3672 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 02, 2024 |
| 18937785 | CLAW-TYPE RIVET-PULLING TOOL | MILLER, WILLIAM L | 3677 | §102§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 05, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialKing Point Enterprise Co. Ltd. has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.
Yanick A Akaragwe has the most, with 1 of King Point Enterprise Co. Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
