Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 32 patents granted in the last 365 days
King Slide Technology Co., Ltd. has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This action is located within 1 distinct art unit. The company is currently working with 1 distinct examiner. HANSEN, JAMES ORVILLE is the busiest examiner, overseeing the 1 pending office action. Since the portfolio only contains 1 pending office action, HANSEN, JAMES ORVILLE is the only examiner currently reviewing the company's work. This singular focus within 1 distinct art unit and the examiner defines the company's current prosecution status.
With only 1 pending office action, the company's immediate patent goals are tied to the outcome of this single case. The placement in 1 distinct art unit within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area suggests a well-defined technical application. Because there is only 1 distinct examiner involved, the company can focus its resources on addressing the specific concerns of HANSEN, JAMES ORVILLE. This streamlined profile, with 1 pending office action and the examiner, allows for a direct and efficient prosecution path without the complexities of managing multiple examiners or art units. Practitioners should focus on the specific feedback provided by HANSEN, JAMES ORVILLE to advance this pending matter.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Double-patenting only | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HANSEN, JAMES ORVILLE | 1 | 70.5% | +21.8% |
| ING, MATTHEW W | 1 | 64.7% | +8.4% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18902915 | SUPPORTING DEVICE | HANSEN, JAMES ORVILLE | 62d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3637 | 2 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18902915 | SUPPORTING DEVICE | HANSEN, JAMES ORVILLE | 3637 | DP | Non-Final OA | 62d | Pending | Sep 30, 2024 |
| 18896916 | SUPPORTING DEVICE | ING, MATTHEW W | 3637 | §103Other | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Sep 26, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialKing Slide Technology Co., Ltd. has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 2 examiners.
James Orville Hansen has the most, with 1 of King Slide Technology Co., Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
