Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Kinugawa Rubber Ind Co. Ltd.

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Kinugawa Rubber Ind Co. Ltd. holds a portfolio in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The company currently has 1 pending office action. This action is being handled by STRIMBU, GREGORY J, who is the busiest examiner for the company with 1 pending matter. This single point of contact for the company's pending work simplifies the management of its intellectual property.

The company's prosecution involves 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. The 1 distinct art unit indicates that the company's current technical focus is confined to a single administrative group. Because there is only 1 pending office action, the company faces a very light prosecution workload at this time. The alignment of 1 distinct examiner with 1 distinct art unit suggests that the company's current patenting efforts are highly specialized and concentrated in one area.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
0
Medium (0%)
1
Easy (100%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§112 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
STRIMBU, GREGORY J 1 56.5% +80.5%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18479166 GLASS RUN STRIMBU, GREGORY J —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3634 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18479166 GLASS RUN STRIMBU, GREGORY J 3634 §112 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 02, 2023

Managing Kinugawa Rubber Ind Co. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Kinugawa Rubber Ind Co. Ltd. have?

Kinugawa Rubber Ind Co. Ltd. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Kinugawa Rubber Ind Co. Ltd. applications?

Gregory J Strimbu has the most, with 1 of Kinugawa Rubber Ind Co. Ltd.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Kinugawa Rubber Ind Co. Ltd.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month