Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Communications
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Kite Group Limited maintains a focused patent portfolio within the Communications technology area. The company currently has 1 pending office action across its active filings. This workload is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, indicating a concentrated prosecution environment. The presence of a single art unit suggests that the company's current intellectual property efforts are confined to a specific technical niche within the Communications sector.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is AZARI, SEPEHR, who is currently handling 1 pending office action. This individual represents the entirety of the company's current pending interactions with the patent office. Practitioners can expect a streamlined communication channel given the lack of diversity in art units and examiners assigned to these matters. Because AZARI, SEPEHR is the only examiner involved, the prosecution strategy for the portfolio is currently dependent on the specific tendencies of this individual.
The portfolio shows a low volume of active negotiation with the patent office. The alignment of a single examiner and art unit for the current matter ensures that all legal correspondence is centralized. This centralization may allow for a more consistent approach to patent prosecution compared to portfolios spread across multiple examiners or art units.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| AZARI, SEPEHR | 1 | 67.0% | +8.3% |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2621 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18457024 | Modular Display System | AZARI, SEPEHR | 2621 | §103 | Final Rejection | 41d | Pending | Aug 28, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial