Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Klass Engineering & Solutions Pte. Ltd. currently has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This action is handled by a distinct examiner, PERRY, MONICA L, in a distinct art unit. The busiest examiner pending count of 1 represents the full extent of the company's current pending workload. With a distinct art unit and a distinct examiner, the company's prosecution is concentrated on a single mechanical systems matter.
PERRY, MONICA L is the sole examiner responsible for the pending transportation and mechanical systems matter. This singular focus means the company's current patent outcomes depend on the review of an official. The presence of a distinct art unit further suggests that the pending technology falls into a specific area within the mechanical systems field. This interaction between the applicant and PERRY, MONICA L defines the current prosecution landscape for the company. The count of examiners and art units for this pending matter limits the communication channel but also concentrates the prosecution outcome on the interpretation of an official. PERRY, MONICA L is the busiest examiner for this pending office action.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PERRY, MONICA L | 1 | 55.9% | +37.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19477068 | Device for Insect Stimulation Using Electrodes | PERRY, MONICA L | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19477068 | Device for Insect Stimulation Using Electrodes | PERRY, MONICA L | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3644 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19477068 | Device for Insect Stimulation Using Electrodes | PERRY, MONICA L | 3644 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 20, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial