Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear LLP

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear LLP currently has 2 pending office actions within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions are distributed across 2 distinct examiners, indicating that the company is engaging with multiple reviewers at the USPTO. The presence of 2 distinct art units suggests that the applications cover different technical sub-fields within the broader Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering category.

The busiest examiner for the company is BUGG, PAIGE KATHLEEN, who is currently handling 1 busiest examiner pending action. This means that the 2 pending office actions are split evenly between the 2 distinct examiners, with each managing 1 case. This lack of examiner concentration requires the company to manage 2 separate prosecution styles simultaneously.

For practitioners, the involvement of 2 distinct art units and 2 distinct examiners implies that the prosecution strategy must be tailored to each individual application. Insights from 1 case may not be applicable to the other, as they are being reviewed in different art units. The 1 busiest examiner pending action under BUGG, PAIGE KATHLEEN represents a portion of the company's current pending workload.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (50%)
1
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BUGG, PAIGE KATHLEEN 1 58.5% +59.0%
HAN, ROBIN 1 33.5% +61.8%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18625582 PROTECTION DEVICE WITH INTEGRATED FILTER MASK AND EYE SHIELD BUGG, PAIGE KATHLEEN —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18608687 PROTECTION DEVICE WITH INTEGRATED FILTER MASK AND EYE SHIELD WITH MAGNIFICATION LENSES HAN, ROBIN 146d overdue
18625582 PROTECTION DEVICE WITH INTEGRATED FILTER MASK AND EYE SHIELD BUGG, PAIGE KATHLEEN —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3785 1
3786 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18625582 PROTECTION DEVICE WITH INTEGRATED FILTER MASK AND EYE SHIELD BUGG, PAIGE KATHLEEN 3785 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 03, 2024
18608687 PROTECTION DEVICE WITH INTEGRATED FILTER MASK AND EYE SHIELD WITH MAGNIFICATION LENSES HAN, ROBIN 3786 §103 Final Rejection 146d overdue Pending Mar 18, 2024

Managing Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear LLP's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear LLP have?

Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear LLP has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear LLP applications?

Paige Kathleen Bugg has the most, with 1 of Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear LLP's pending office actions.

What technology area are Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear LLP's patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month