Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Knockeat Ltd. currently manages 1 pending office action. This prosecution activity is handled by 1 distinct examiner, JANG, JAEICK. The data indicates that 0 distinct art units are associated with this portfolio, which suggests the application may be in a preliminary stage or transitioning between classifications.
The busiest examiner, JANG, JAEICK, is responsible for 1 pending office action. Since there is only 1 pending office action in total, this examiner oversees the entirety of the company's current active filings. The presence of 1 distinct examiner for the 1 pending action means there is no variation in examiner perspective across the portfolio at this time.
Practitioners should observe that the 0 distinct art units reported may impact how the case is routed within the patent office. With 1 pending office action, the legal focus is narrow. The 1 distinct examiner assigned will be the primary point of contact for all current prosecution matters. No other examiners are currently involved, as shown by the count of 1 distinct examiner. The 1 pending action held by the busiest examiner represents the full extent of the current workload.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| JANG, JAEICK | 1 | 66.7% | +52.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18292923 | AN INGESTIBLE CAPSULE DEVICE WITH ONE OR MORE MOTION DEVICES FOR GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT STIMULATION | JANG, JAEICK | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18292923 | AN INGESTIBLE CAPSULE DEVICE WITH ONE OR MORE MOTION DEVICES FOR GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT STIMULATION | JANG, JAEICK | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18292923 | AN INGESTIBLE CAPSULE DEVICE WITH ONE OR MORE MOTION DEVICES FOR GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT STIMULATION | JANG, JAEICK | — | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 28, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial