Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Kocliko operates a company patent portfolio in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. The portfolio currently includes 1 pending office action. This action is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner and is situated within 1 distinct art unit. This indicates a singular focus for the company's current patent office interactions. For a practitioner, this means that the prosecution outcome for the pending matter depends entirely on the specific practices of this 1 distinct examiner and the 1 distinct art unit involved.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is ZAAB, SHARAH, who is assigned 1 busiest examiner pending action. Because there is only 1 pending office action in total, ZAAB, SHARAH is the only examiner currently engaged with the portfolio. This concentrated activity allows for a very specific focus on the requirements and preferences of a single reviewer within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics sector. The absence of multiple pending actions simplifies the monitoring process but increases the impact of individual examiner tendencies on the overall portfolio. Practitioners must carefully address the specific standards of the 1 distinct art unit to advance the 1 pending office action.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZAAB, SHARAH | 1 | 70.5% | +26.4% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18698411 | METHOD, DEVICE AND SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING AN AMOUNT OF THERMAL ENERGY SUPPLIED TO A ROOM IN A BUILDING OVER A GIVEN PERIOD | ZAAB, SHARAH | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2857 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18698411 | METHOD, DEVICE AND SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING AN AMOUNT OF THERMAL ENERGY SUPPLIED TO A ROOM IN A BUILDING OVER A GIVEN PERIOD | ZAAB, SHARAH | 2857 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 04, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialKocliko has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Sharah Zaab has the most, with 1 of Kocliko's pending office actions.
Mostly Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics (USPTO Tech Center 2800), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
