Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026

Kodiak Robotics Inc.

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

9 pending office actions • 8 art units • 8 examiners • 0 of 9 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 30 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Kodiak Robotics Inc. has 8 pending office actions in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems. The docket spans 7 distinct examiners and 7 distinct art units, showing broad distribution across examination personnel and technical groups.

LEVY, MERRITT E is the busiest examiner, with 2 pending matters. That examiner-specific cluster merits coordinated review, while the other pending matters require separate analysis of their assigned examination settings and claim issues.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

9
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
3
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 60 days (3)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (22%)
7
Medium (78%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only7 (78%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (22%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
11% of docket
1
Communications
11% of docket
1
Semiconductors
11% of docket
6
Mechanical / Eng
67% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

90 h
Manual time on pending OAs
18 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
31 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.8 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LEVY, MERRITT E 2 31.7% +35.6%
FEES, CHRISTOPHER GEORGE 1 56.9% +22.0%
HO, MATTHEW 1 74.5% +12.7%
PEDERSEN, DAVID RUBEN 1 57.4% +51.6%
WILLIAMS, JAMEL E 1 88.8% +9.4%
WILLIAMS, REBECCA COLETTE 1 50.0% +58.3%
FABER, DAVID 1 50.8% +36.9%
CLEMMONS, STEVE M 1 69.7% +20.9%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18129708 ROOF MOUNTED SENSOR POD ASSEMBLY WILLIAMS, JAMEL E —

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18179075 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING A HEATMAP CORRESPONDING TO AN ENVIRONMENT OF A VEHICLE WILLIAMS, REBECCA COLETTE 29d overdue
17826043 CONNECTING ASSEMBLY FOR A SENSOR POD CLEMMONS, STEVE M —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18179075 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING A HEATMAP CORRESPONDING TO AN ENVIRONMENT OF A VEHICLE WILLIAMS, REBECCA COLETTE 29d overdue
18364816 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VEHICLE CONTROL USING AUTONOMOUS AND REMOTE OPERATION LEVY, MERRITT E 46d
18364822 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING VEHICLE ACTUATOR COMMANDS BASED ON VEHICLE TRAJECTORIES LEVY, MERRITT E 49d
18364819 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VEHICLE CONTROL USING FALLBACK-ENABLED REMOTE OPERATION HO, MATTHEW 56d
18364830 SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF GENERATING A TRAJECTORY OF A VEHICLE BY MIXING AUTONOMOUSLY GENERATED AND REMOTELY GENERATED VEHICLE TRAJECTORIES FEES, CHRISTOPHER GEORGE —
18364825 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONTROLLING MOVEMENT OF A VEHICLE USING REMOTE OPERATION BASED ON PERCEPTION AND PLANNER DATA PEDERSEN, DAVID RUBEN —
18178720 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING AND LABELING A COLLIDABILITY OF ONE OR MORE OBSTACLES ALONG TRAJECTORIES OF AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES FABER, DAVID —
17826043 CONNECTING ASSEMBLY FOR A SENSOR POD CLEMMONS, STEVE M —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3663 2
3662 1
3669 1
3658 1
2855 1
2677 1
2172 1
3613 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18364816 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VEHICLE CONTROL USING AUTONOMOUS AND REMOTE OPERATION LEVY, MERRITT E 3663 §103 Non-Final OA 46d Pending Aug 03, 2023
18364830 SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF GENERATING A TRAJECTORY OF A VEHICLE BY MIXING AUTONOMOUSLY GENERATED AND REMOTELY GENERATED VEHICLE TRAJECTORIES FEES, CHRISTOPHER GEORGE 3662 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 03, 2023
18364819 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VEHICLE CONTROL USING FALLBACK-ENABLED REMOTE OPERATION HO, MATTHEW 3669 §103 Final Rejection 56d Pending Aug 03, 2023
18364825 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONTROLLING MOVEMENT OF A VEHICLE USING REMOTE OPERATION BASED ON PERCEPTION AND PLANNER DATA PEDERSEN, DAVID RUBEN 3658 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 03, 2023
18364822 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING VEHICLE ACTUATOR COMMANDS BASED ON VEHICLE TRAJECTORIES LEVY, MERRITT E 3663 §103 Final Rejection 49d Pending Aug 03, 2023
18129708 ROOF MOUNTED SENSOR POD ASSEMBLY WILLIAMS, JAMEL E 2855 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 31, 2023
18179075 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING A HEATMAP CORRESPONDING TO AN ENVIRONMENT OF A VEHICLE WILLIAMS, REBECCA COLETTE 2677 §102§103 Non-Final OA 29d overdue Pending Mar 06, 2023
18178720 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING AND LABELING A COLLIDABILITY OF ONE OR MORE OBSTACLES ALONG TRAJECTORIES OF AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES FABER, DAVID 2172 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 06, 2023
17826043 CONNECTING ASSEMBLY FOR A SENSOR POD CLEMMONS, STEVE M 3613 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 26, 2022

Managing Kodiak Robotics Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Kodiak Robotics Inc. have?

Kodiak Robotics Inc. has 9 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 8 art units and 8 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Kodiak Robotics Inc. applications?

Merritt E Levy has the most, with 2 of Kodiak Robotics Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Kodiak Robotics Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month