Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Kolon Life Science Inc.

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Kolon Life Science Inc. has 2 pending office actions currently active in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. These matters are both located within 1 distinct art unit, which suggests a high degree of technical consistency in the company's current filings. Despite being in the same art unit, the cases are assigned to 2 distinct examiners, introducing different individual perspectives into the prosecution process. This structure allows the applicant to benefit from a consistent art unit policy while navigating the specific preferences of multiple officials.

The busiest examiner, RAHMAN, MASUDUR, is responsible for 1 pending office action. With the total workload split between the assigned examiners, the company can observe how different individuals within the same art unit interpret their biotechnology claims. This can provide valuable insights for future filing strategies and help refine the approach to claim drafting. Focusing on a single distinct art unit simplifies the high-level legal research required, as the general practices of that unit will apply to both pending matters.

However, the use of multiple examiners means that practitioners must still tailor their responses to individual preferences. The pending office actions represent a concentrated but multi-perspective engagement with the patent office's life sciences division. Success in this 1 distinct art unit will depend on the ability to reconcile the feedback from RAHMAN, MASUDUR with the requirements of the other assigned examiner. This balanced workload ensures that the company's Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals innovations receive thorough and varied scrutiny.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (50%)
1
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
RAHMAN, MASUDUR 1 72.7% +31.7%
SPENCE, JENNIFER SUZANNE 1 66.9% +46.0%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18281412 COMPOSITION FOR PREVENTING OR TREATING DEGENERATIVE BRAIN DISEASES RAHMAN, MASUDUR 21d

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18281412 COMPOSITION FOR PREVENTING OR TREATING DEGENERATIVE BRAIN DISEASES RAHMAN, MASUDUR 21d
16963046 RECOMBINANT VACCINIA VIRUS AND PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITION COMPRISING SAME SPENCE, JENNIFER SUZANNE —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1633 2

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18281412 COMPOSITION FOR PREVENTING OR TREATING DEGENERATIVE BRAIN DISEASES RAHMAN, MASUDUR 1633 §102§103 Non-Final OA 21d Pending Sep 11, 2023
16963046 RECOMBINANT VACCINIA VIRUS AND PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITION COMPRISING SAME SPENCE, JENNIFER SUZANNE 1633 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 17, 2020

Managing Kolon Life Science Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month