Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Kool Conceptz LLC maintains a company patent portfolio that currently features 1 pending office actions. This single matter indicates a limited current prosecution presence. The data shows that 1 distinct examiners are involved in reviewing this portfolio. This one-to-one ratio between the action and the examiner means the current trajectory of the company's intellectual property is in the hands of one individual. The prosecution strategy for Kool Conceptz LLC is currently entirely dependent on the interactions with this single examiner.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is FURDGE, LARRY L. This examiner is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Because the portfolio only contains 1 pending office actions, FURDGE, LARRY L is the sole examiner currently active for the company. The data reports 0 distinct art units, which may indicate a specific administrative status for this filing. Practitioners should focus their efforts on the specific requirements of FURDGE, LARRY L to advance the portfolio. The absence of multiple art units simplifies the coordination of the current prosecution effort.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| FURDGE, LARRY L | 1 | 62.3% | +16.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19015444 | ICE BAG SYSTEM | FURDGE, LARRY L | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19015444 | ICE BAG SYSTEM | FURDGE, LARRY L | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19015444 | ICE BAG SYSTEM | FURDGE, LARRY L | — | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 09, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial