Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Koppers Fishing And Tackle Corp. currently manages a concentrated patent portfolio within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The data shows 1 pending office action across the entire portfolio. This pending matter is handled by 1 distinct examiner working within 1 distinct art unit, indicating a narrow focus for current prosecution efforts. Such concentration allows for a more predictable interaction with the patent office, as the company only needs to navigate the specific technical interpretations of 1 distinct art unit.
Examiner ALMATRAHI, SAHAR FARIS is identified as the busiest examiner for the company. This individual is responsible for the 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Because the total number of pending office actions is 1, this examiner manages the company's active workload at the office. This alignment between the busiest examiner and the total pending actions suggests that the company's immediate patent strategy is dependent on the review process of this official. The presence of 1 distinct examiner further confirms that the technical scope of the company's current applications is confined to a single specialized group within the patent office.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALMATRAHI, SAHAR FARIS | 1 | 30.3% | +56.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17254769 | COMBINATION LURE | ALMATRAHI, SAHAR FARIS | 28d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17254769 | COMBINATION LURE | ALMATRAHI, SAHAR FARIS | 28d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3643 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17254769 | COMBINATION LURE | ALMATRAHI, SAHAR FARIS | 3643 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | 28d | Pending | Dec 21, 2020 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial