Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Korean Ministry Of Food And Drug Safety currently has 1 pending office action within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, OYEYEMI, OLAYINKA A, who is the busiest examiner with 1 pending application. The portfolio is active in 1 distinct art unit, which indicates a narrow technical focus for the current filings.
With 1 pending office action, the company's current prosecution effort is highly concentrated. The assignment to 1 distinct examiner, OYEYEMI, OLAYINKA A, means that the company's immediate patent goals are subject to the review of a single individual. This 1 to 1 ratio between pending actions and art units indicates that the company is pursuing a specific technical path within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals sector.
For practitioners, managing 1 pending office action under 1 distinct examiner requires a focused administrative approach. The success of the portfolio depends on the 1 pending application handled by OYEYEMI, OLAYINKA A. By addressing the requirements of the 1 distinct art unit, the company can effectively progress its intellectual property goals in this specialized technology area.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| OYEYEMI, OLAYINKA A | 1 | 60.4% | +46.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17692236 | PRIMER SET FOR DETECTING FOOD POISONING BACTERIA BY USING NEXT-GENERATION SEQUENCING METHOD AND METHOD FOR DETECTING FOOD POISONING BACTERIA BY USING THE PRIMER SET | OYEYEMI, OLAYINKA A | 34d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17692236 | PRIMER SET FOR DETECTING FOOD POISONING BACTERIA BY USING NEXT-GENERATION SEQUENCING METHOD AND METHOD FOR DETECTING FOOD POISONING BACTERIA BY USING THE PRIMER SET | OYEYEMI, OLAYINKA A | 34d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1681 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17692236 | PRIMER SET FOR DETECTING FOOD POISONING BACTERIA BY USING NEXT-GENERATION SEQUENCING METHOD AND METHOD FOR DETECTING FOOD POISONING BACTERIA BY USING THE PRIMER SET | OYEYEMI, OLAYINKA A | 1681 | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | 34d | Pending | Mar 11, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial