Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Korozo Ambalaj Sanayi Ve Ticaret A S has 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This active matter represents the company's current engagement with the patent office in this technical sector. The presence of a pending action suggests a highly focused or early-stage prosecution strategy for the company's chemistry-related intellectual property.
The company's current prosecution involves 1 distinct examiner and a specific art unit. This alignment indicates that the company's current patent applications are being reviewed within a narrow technical niche. Megha Mehta Gaitonde is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, overseeing the pending office action. Because all active work is consolidated under this individual, the prosecution process is highly centralized.
For patent practitioners, this concentration means that the outcome of the company's current patent efforts depends significantly on the examination style of Megha Mehta Gaitonde. The lack of broader distribution across multiple art units or examiners simplifies the coordination of prosecution but also limits the variety of examiner perspectives within the portfolio. Future filings in the Chemistry & Materials area may continue to be assigned to this specific art unit if they share similar technical classifications.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GAITONDE, MEGHA MEHTA | 1 | 40.5% | +35.6% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18693172 | PACKAGING FILM | GAITONDE, MEGHA MEHTA | 34d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1781 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18693172 | PACKAGING FILM | GAITONDE, MEGHA MEHTA | 1781 | §103 | Final Rejection | 34d | Pending | Mar 19, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial