Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Kumovis GmbH

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Kumovis GmbH is navigating the patent prosecution process in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The company currently has 3 pending office actions, which are being handled by 3 distinct examiners. This ratio of actions to examiners indicates that each of the company's active applications is being scrutinized by a different individual at the USPTO. This arrangement necessitates a prosecution strategy that can accommodate these different examination styles and potentially different technical interpretations of the company's inventions.

The active prosecution is spread across 2 distinct art units, showing that the company's technology is categorized into at least 2 different specialized technical groups. TRAN, VI N is identified as the busiest examiner for the company, with 1 busiest examiner pending action. For practitioners, this distribution across 3 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units means that prosecution strategies must be carefully tailored. The focus should be on addressing the specific expectations of each examiner while maintaining a unified technical position across the different art units to ensure the overall structure of the patent portfolio.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (50%)
1
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§102 only1 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
50% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
TRAN, VI N 1 46.0% +34.6%
FLORES, ADRIAN 1 100.0% +0.0%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18248679 ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING DEVICE, METHOD AND MEDICAL DEVICE THEREFOR FLORES, ADRIAN 39d

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18708033 A METHOD OF PRODUCING A COMPONENT, AND THE COMPONENT ITSELF TRAN, VI N —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18708033 A METHOD OF PRODUCING A COMPONENT, AND THE COMPONENT ITSELF TRAN, VI N —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2169 1
3774 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18708033 A METHOD OF PRODUCING A COMPONENT, AND THE COMPONENT ITSELF TRAN, VI N 2169 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 07, 2024
18248679 ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING DEVICE, METHOD AND MEDICAL DEVICE THEREFOR FLORES, ADRIAN 3774 §102 Non-Final OA 39d Pending Apr 11, 2023

Managing Kumovis GmbH's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Kumovis GmbH have?

Kumovis GmbH has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Kumovis GmbH applications?

Vi N Tran has the most, with 1 of Kumovis GmbH's pending office actions.

What technology area are Kumovis GmbH's patent applications in?

Mostly Computing & Software (USPTO Tech Center 2100), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month