Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Kunshan Yijia Ju Textile Co. Ltd. operates within the Chemistry & Materials technology area with a portfolio that currently features 1 pending office action. This single active matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, indicating a focused approach to its current intellectual property filings. The data shows that the company is interacting with 1 distinct art unit, which suggests that its current patent applications are concentrated within a specific regulatory and technical classification at the patent office.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is PIERCE, JEREMY R, who is currently overseeing 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Since there is only 1 pending office action in total for the company, this examiner holds responsibility for the company's entire active prosecution workload. This one-to-one ratio between the pending action and the examiner highlights a lack of complexity in the current portfolio management. Practitioners can observe that the company's immediate success in the Chemistry & Materials sector is tied to the decisions of this single examiner, as there are no other active matters distributed across different art units.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §112 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PIERCE, JEREMY R | 1 | 56.8% | +43.2% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18269289 | CARPET PAD | PIERCE, JEREMY R | 25d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1789 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18269289 | CARPET PAD | PIERCE, JEREMY R | 1789 | §112 | Final Rejection | 25d overdue | Pending | Jun 23, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial