Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Kurt Imren Yapici has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, GOKHALE, PRASAD V. This examiner is the busiest for the company, handling 1 pending action. The prosecution is occurring within 1 distinct art unit. With 1 pending office action and 1 distinct examiner, the company's current patent activity is highly focused.
The presence of 1 distinct art unit indicates a specific technical area of interest for this single pending action. GOKHALE, PRASAD V is the sole examiner responsible for the 1 pending action currently on record. This concentrated prosecution environment allows for a direct and singular focus on the requirements of 1 distinct art unit. Practitioners can dedicate their efforts to the specific preferences of this 1 distinct examiner. The presence of 1 action and 1 examiner simplifies the management of the 1 pending office action. This streamlined approach is characteristic of a portfolio with a single active matter in the mechanical systems sector.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GOKHALE, PRASAD V | 1 | 85.9% | +8.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19227701 | CRANKSHAFT FOR AN INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE | GOKHALE, PRASAD V | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3617 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19227701 | CRANKSHAFT FOR AN INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE | GOKHALE, PRASAD V | 3617 | §102§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 04, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial