Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Kx Systems Inc. maintains a streamlined presence in the Computing & Software technology area, currently managing 1 pending office action. This action is assigned to RAAB, CHRISTOPHER J, who is the busiest examiner for the company. With 1 busiest examiner pending action, the entire active portfolio is currently under the review of this single individual.
The company's activity is restricted to 1 distinct art unit, indicating a narrow technical focus within Computing & Software. Having only 1 distinct examiner means that the company does not currently need to navigate multiple examiner personalities or varying art unit standards. The 1 pending office action represents the sole focus of the company's current prosecution efforts at the USPTO.
Practitioners can dedicate their attention to the specific requirements of the 1 distinct art unit involved. Since there is only 1 distinct examiner, the relationship with RAAB, CHRISTOPHER J is the primary factor in the portfolio's current progress. This concentration of the 1 pending office action under one examiner allows for a highly specific and unified approach to resolving the outstanding matter.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| RAAB, CHRISTOPHER J | 1 | 76.7% | +14.3% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18936361 | Optimizing Vector Embedding Representations of Time-Series Information via Frequency Domain Representations | RAAB, CHRISTOPHER J | 30d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2156 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18936361 | Optimizing Vector Embedding Representations of Time-Series Information via Frequency Domain Representations | RAAB, CHRISTOPHER J | 2156 | §103 | Final Rejection | 30d overdue | Pending | Nov 04, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial