Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Kyb Motorcycle Suspension Co. Ltd.

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Kyb Motorcycle Suspension Co. Ltd. has 2 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions are split between 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units, ensuring a distributed workload. KRAMER, DEVON C is the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action, reflecting a balanced distribution of the current workload across the USPTO. This lack of examiner concentration means that the company's prosecution results are subject to the individual discretion of two different officials.

The 2 distinct art units involved suggest that the company's mechanical innovations are being reviewed by different specialized groups. This variety requires a case-by-case approach to prosecution rather than a single unified strategy. With 2 distinct examiners involved, practitioners should expect to navigate two different examination styles across the 2 distinct art units. This distribution helps mitigate the risk that a single examiner's negative trend could impact the entire pending portfolio.

Because KRAMER, DEVON C and the other distinct examiner each have only 1 pending office action, the workload is evenly spread. This balance is a key feature of the company's current prosecution profile in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector. The presence of 2 distinct art units indicates that the technology being prosecuted is diverse enough to be routed to different technical groups at the USPTO.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (50%)
1
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§102 only1 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KRAMER, DEVON C 1 15.3% +16.1%
WATKINS, NATHANIEL WILLIAM 1 68.9% +27.1%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18871706 SHOCK ABSORBER KRAMER, DEVON C —
18760056 FRONT FORK WATKINS, NATHANIEL WILLIAM —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18871706 SHOCK ABSORBER KRAMER, DEVON C —
18760056 FRONT FORK WATKINS, NATHANIEL WILLIAM —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3741 1
3617 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18871706 SHOCK ABSORBER KRAMER, DEVON C 3741 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 04, 2024
18760056 FRONT FORK WATKINS, NATHANIEL WILLIAM 3617 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 01, 2024

Managing Kyb Motorcycle Suspension Co. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Kyb Motorcycle Suspension Co. Ltd. have?

Kyb Motorcycle Suspension Co. Ltd. has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Kyb Motorcycle Suspension Co. Ltd. applications?

Devon C Kramer has the most, with 1 of Kyb Motorcycle Suspension Co. Ltd.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Kyb Motorcycle Suspension Co. Ltd.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month