Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
5 pending office actions • 3 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Kyoobe Tech GmbH’s portfolio is in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems and has 5 pending office actions. The matters are assigned to 5 distinct examiners across 3 distinct art units, indicating broad examiner distribution and some concentration at the art-unit level. Counsel should maintain separate matter tracking while checking whether related claim issues recur across the portfolio.
TIGHE, BRENDAN P is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending matter. That assignment is one part of a record handled by several examiners, so it should not be used as a proxy for the entire portfolio. Effective prosecution management requires examiner-specific responses, art-unit awareness, and coordinated claim positions across transportation, e-commerce, and mechanical subject matter.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §102 only | 1 (20%) |
| Double-patenting + other | 1 (20%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 3 (60%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| TIGHE, BRENDAN P | 1 | 76.2% | +19.4% |
| ABDELSALAM, FATHI KAMAL | 1 | 12.6% | +18.9% |
| CARREON, ADRIAN JOHN | 1 | 80.0% | +33.3% |
| ABEL, LENORA A | 1 | 68.7% | +33.8% |
| BROTHERS, LAURENCE RAPHAEL | 1 | 89.0% | +15.6% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18414587 | PRODUCTION SYSTEM AND PROCESS FOR PRODUCING A PRODUCT | CARREON, ADRIAN JOHN | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18414400 | PRODUCTION SYSTEM AND PROCESS FOR PRODUCING A PRODUCT | BROTHERS, LAURENCE RAPHAEL | 20d |
| 18414592 | PRODUCTION SYSTEM AND PROCESS FOR PRODUCING A PRODUCT | ABDELSALAM, FATHI KAMAL | — |
| 18414589 | PRODUCTION SYSTEM AND PROCESS FOR PRODUCING A PRODUCT | ABEL, LENORA A | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18414400 | PRODUCTION SYSTEM AND PROCESS FOR PRODUCING A PRODUCT | BROTHERS, LAURENCE RAPHAEL | 20d |
| 18414584 | PRODUCTION SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING A PRODUCT | TIGHE, BRENDAN P | — |
| 18414592 | PRODUCTION SYSTEM AND PROCESS FOR PRODUCING A PRODUCT | ABDELSALAM, FATHI KAMAL | — |
| 18414587 | PRODUCTION SYSTEM AND PROCESS FOR PRODUCING A PRODUCT | CARREON, ADRIAN JOHN | — |
| 18414589 | PRODUCTION SYSTEM AND PROCESS FOR PRODUCING A PRODUCT | ABEL, LENORA A | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3655 | 2 |
| 1799 | 2 |
| 3762 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18414584 | PRODUCTION SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING A PRODUCT | TIGHE, BRENDAN P | 3762 | §102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 17, 2024 |
| 18414592 | PRODUCTION SYSTEM AND PROCESS FOR PRODUCING A PRODUCT | ABDELSALAM, FATHI KAMAL | 3655 | §103§112Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 17, 2024 |
| 18414587 | PRODUCTION SYSTEM AND PROCESS FOR PRODUCING A PRODUCT | CARREON, ADRIAN JOHN | 1799 | §102§103§112DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 17, 2024 |
| 18414589 | PRODUCTION SYSTEM AND PROCESS FOR PRODUCING A PRODUCT | ABEL, LENORA A | 1799 | §102§112Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 17, 2024 |
| 18414400 | PRODUCTION SYSTEM AND PROCESS FOR PRODUCING A PRODUCT | BROTHERS, LAURENCE RAPHAEL | 3655 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | 20d | Pending | Jan 16, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialKyoobe Tech GmbH has 5 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 5 examiners.
Brendan P Tighe has the most, with 1 of Kyoobe Tech GmbH's pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
