Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Kögel Filter GmbH Contecma-Filtration maintains a company patent portfolio in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The data shows 2 pending office actions for this portfolio. These actions are distributed among 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. This distribution indicates that the company's mechanical and medical innovations are currently being reviewed across different specialized sections of the patent office.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is NIESZ, JASON KAROL, who is handling 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Since there are 2 pending office actions in total, this examiner is responsible for 1 of the active workload items. The presence of 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units for only 2 actions suggests that the subject matter of the applications is diverse enough to fall under different classification regimes. Practitioners must therefore prepare for two separate prosecution tracks, each with its own examiner and art unit standards. This requires a versatile approach to addressing the specific requirements of the medical and mechanical engineering sectors while ensuring that each application is tailored to its respective examiner.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| NIESZ, JASON KAROL | 1 | 77.6% | +24.9% |
| JANGBAHADUR, ANEISA SAVEENI | 1 | — | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19218767 | CONTAINERS, TRANSFER RECEPTACLES, SYSTEM THEREFROM AND METHOD FOR TRANSFERRING A SUBSTANCE BETWEEN BOTH | NIESZ, JASON KAROL | — |
| 18769658 | FREEZE-DRYING TRAY | JANGBAHADUR, ANEISA SAVEENI | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19218767 | CONTAINERS, TRANSFER RECEPTACLES, SYSTEM THEREFROM AND METHOD FOR TRANSFERRING A SUBSTANCE BETWEEN BOTH | NIESZ, JASON KAROL | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3753 | 1 |
| 3762 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19218767 | CONTAINERS, TRANSFER RECEPTACLES, SYSTEM THEREFROM AND METHOD FOR TRANSFERRING A SUBSTANCE BETWEEN BOTH | NIESZ, JASON KAROL | 3753 | §102§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 27, 2025 |
| 18769658 | FREEZE-DRYING TRAY | JANGBAHADUR, ANEISA SAVEENI | 3762 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 11, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialKögel Filter GmbH Contecma-Filtration has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.
Jason Karol Niesz has the most, with 1 of Kögel Filter GmbH Contecma-Filtration's pending office actions.
Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
