Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Körber Supply Chain Dk A/S is currently managing 1 pending office action. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, which centralizes the applicant's current prosecution efforts. The data does not specify a technology area, suggesting that this single filing is the primary focus of the applicant's current interactions with the patent office.
Examiner HOLMES, JUSTIN is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, currently overseeing 1 pending office action. Because this 1 action represents the entirety of the pending workload, the examiner's individual review speed and requirements are the most critical factors for the applicant. With 1 pending action and 1 distinct examiner, the prosecution process is straightforward and lacks the complexity of managing multiple examiners or art units, allowing for a dedicated response to the single official involved.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HOLMES, JUSTIN | 1 | 88.9% | +10.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18833948 | PALLETIZING/DE-PALLETIZING SYSTEM | HOLMES, JUSTIN | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18833948 | PALLETIZING/DE-PALLETIZING SYSTEM | HOLMES, JUSTIN | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18833948 | PALLETIZING/DE-PALLETIZING SYSTEM | HOLMES, JUSTIN | — | §102§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 29, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial