Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
2 pending office actions • 0 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
La San Marco S P A currently manages 2 pending office actions. These matters are distributed across 2 distinct examiners, indicating that each pending action is being reviewed by a different individual. This distribution ensures that the company's current filings are not concentrated under a single examiner's review.
The busiest examiner is DICKSTEIN, WILLIAM DOUGLAS, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. This count of 1 represents a portion of the 2 total pending actions for the organization. With 2 examiners for 2 actions, the workload is evenly split, requiring the company to navigate two separate examiner perspectives for its current active matters.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §112 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| DICKSTEIN, WILLIAM DOUGLAS | 1 | 33.3% | +0.0% |
| KRASNOW, NICHOLAS R | 1 | 66.3% | +13.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18836880 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR GRINDING SEEDS | DICKSTEIN, WILLIAM DOUGLAS | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18286591 | COFFEE PERCOLATOR AND METHOD OF DELIVERING COFFEE | KRASNOW, NICHOLAS R | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18836880 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR GRINDING SEEDS | DICKSTEIN, WILLIAM DOUGLAS | — | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 08, 2024 |
| 18286591 | COFFEE PERCOLATOR AND METHOD OF DELIVERING COFFEE | KRASNOW, NICHOLAS R | — | §112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 12, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial