Technology area: Computing & Software
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Laempe Moessner Sinto GmbH operates in the Computing & Software technology area with 1 pending office action. This action is being processed by 1 distinct examiner within 1 distinct art unit. This indicates a focused and singular prosecution effort for the company's current patent applications. The concentration of 1 pending office action in a single unit suggests that the company is not currently pursuing a broad array of active cases across different technical groups.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is COLLINS, GARY, who is overseeing 1 pending office action. As there is only 1 pending office action in total, this examiner is responsible for the company's entire active docket at the USPTO. The involvement of 1 distinct art unit suggests that the technology being patented is specialized within the computing and software field. With 1 distinct examiner assigned, the company's immediate patent strategy is concentrated on a single examination process.
Practitioners should focus on the specific requirements of COLLINS, GARY to move the 1 busiest examiner pending case forward. The data reflects a portfolio that is not yet diversified across multiple 1 distinct art units or examiners. This centralized approach simplifies administrative tracking but means the outcome of the 1 pending office action will be the primary determinant of the company's success in the Computing & Software sector.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| COLLINS, GARY | 1 | 83.3% | +15.4% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18263710 | METHOD FOR DISCHARGING PARTICULATE BUILDING MATERIAL IN A 3D PRINTER | COLLINS, GARY | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18263710 | METHOD FOR DISCHARGING PARTICULATE BUILDING MATERIAL IN A 3D PRINTER | COLLINS, GARY | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2115 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18263710 | METHOD FOR DISCHARGING PARTICULATE BUILDING MATERIAL IN A 3D PRINTER | COLLINS, GARY | 2115 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Aug 01, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialLaempe Moessner Sinto GmbH has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Gary Collins has the most, with 1 of Laempe Moessner Sinto GmbH's pending office actions.
Mostly Computing & Software (USPTO Tech Center 2100), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
