Technology area: Computing & Software
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Laempe Mössner Sinto GmbH has 2 pending office actions in the Computing & Software technology area. The prosecution involves 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. Nathan L Laughlin is the busiest examiner, handling 1 pending office action currently assigned.
This distribution suggests that the company's software-related developments are being reviewed by multiple specialized examination groups. The presence of 2 distinct examiners for 2 pending office actions shows a decentralized prosecution profile. The involvement of 2 distinct art units indicates that the company's innovations cover a variety of computing applications. Because the workload is split between 2 examiners, there is no single primary point of contact for the pending matters. This distribution may require the application of different prosecution tactics depending on the specific art unit involved. The current data highlights a diverse set of filings within the Computing & Software sector for the company, which may result in varying timelines for patent issuance across the portfolio.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MONTY, MARZIA T | 1 | 70.8% | +30.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18683118 | METHOD FOR INFLUENCING COMPONENTS OR ASSEMBLIES IN A 3D PRINTER | MONTY, MARZIA T | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18683118 | METHOD FOR INFLUENCING COMPONENTS OR ASSEMBLIES IN A 3D PRINTER | MONTY, MARZIA T | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2117 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18683118 | METHOD FOR INFLUENCING COMPONENTS OR ASSEMBLIES IN A 3D PRINTER | MONTY, MARZIA T | 2117 | §101§102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 12, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialLaempe Mössner Sinto GmbH has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Marzia T Monty has the most, with 1 of Laempe Mössner Sinto GmbH's pending office actions.
Mostly Computing & Software (USPTO Tech Center 2100), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
