Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
2 pending office actions • 0 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Laempe Mössner Sinto GmbH currently manages 2 pending office actions at the patent office. These cases are distributed among 2 distinct examiners, resulting in a one-to-one ratio of actions to examiners. The busiest examiner for this portfolio is LAUGHLIN, NATHAN L, who is responsible for 1 pending office action.
Since each of the 2 distinct examiners is handling exactly 1 pending action, the workload is evenly split across the assigned personnel. This distribution ensures that no single examiner has a dominant role in the company's current prosecution efforts. The company must manage two separate individual relationships to advance its pending applications.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (50%) |
| §112 only | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LAUGHLIN, NATHAN L | 1 | 66.9% | +11.1% |
| MONTY, MARZIA T | 1 | 70.8% | +30.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18683118 | METHOD FOR INFLUENCING COMPONENTS OR ASSEMBLIES IN A 3D PRINTER | MONTY, MARZIA T | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18854173 | METHOD FOR PRODUCING A 3D STRUCTURE IN A 3D PRINTING METHOD | LAUGHLIN, NATHAN L | — |
| 18683118 | METHOD FOR INFLUENCING COMPONENTS OR ASSEMBLIES IN A 3D PRINTER | MONTY, MARZIA T | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18854173 | METHOD FOR PRODUCING A 3D STRUCTURE IN A 3D PRINTING METHOD | LAUGHLIN, NATHAN L | — | §112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 04, 2024 |
| 18683118 | METHOD FOR INFLUENCING COMPONENTS OR ASSEMBLIES IN A 3D PRINTER | MONTY, MARZIA T | — | §101§102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 12, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial