Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
5 pending office actions • 2 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 4 (80%) |
| §112 only | 1 (20%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LI, YONGHONG | 1 | 76.7% | +22.3% |
| ABRAHAM, JOHN BISHOY SAM | 1 | 71.4% | +40.0% |
| RIDDER, CLAYTON PAUL | 1 | 72.7% | +40.0% |
| MULL, FRED H | 1 | 67.4% | +15.9% |
| MOORE, WHITNEY | 1 | 88.3% | +9.7% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18250882 | METHOD FOR DETERMINING A DISTANCE USING A HIGH-RESOLUTION METHOD BASED ON SIGNAL PROPAGATION TIME MEASUREMENTS | MOORE, WHITNEY | 16d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18640145 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR SECOND NODE SUPPORTED AMBIGUITY DECISION | LI, YONGHONG | 9d overdue |
| 18250884 | METHOD FOR RADIO-BASED DISTANCE MEASUREMENT | MULL, FRED H | 12d |
| 18251036 | METHOD FOR DETERMINING CALIBRATION FOR MEASURING TRANSIT TIME | RIDDER, CLAYTON PAUL | 13d |
| 18250835 | METHOD FOR A ONE-SIDED RADIO-BASED DISTANCE MEASUREMENT | ABRAHAM, JOHN BISHOY SAM | 28d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3646 | 3 |
| 3648 | 2 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18640145 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR SECOND NODE SUPPORTED AMBIGUITY DECISION | LI, YONGHONG | 3648 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 9d overdue | Pending | Apr 19, 2024 |
| 18250835 | METHOD FOR A ONE-SIDED RADIO-BASED DISTANCE MEASUREMENT | ABRAHAM, JOHN BISHOY SAM | 3646 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 28d | Pending | Jun 23, 2023 |
| 18251036 | METHOD FOR DETERMINING CALIBRATION FOR MEASURING TRANSIT TIME | RIDDER, CLAYTON PAUL | 3646 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 13d | Pending | Jun 23, 2023 |
| 18250884 | METHOD FOR RADIO-BASED DISTANCE MEASUREMENT | MULL, FRED H | 3648 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 12d | Pending | Jun 23, 2023 |
| 18250882 | METHOD FOR DETERMINING A DISTANCE USING A HIGH-RESOLUTION METHOD BASED ON SIGNAL PROPAGATION TIME MEASUREMENTS | MOORE, WHITNEY | 3646 | §112 | Non-Final OA | 16d | Pending | Apr 27, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial