Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
4 pending office actions • 0 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Landa Corporation Ltd. is currently navigating 5 pending office actions, all of which are located within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. Despite the volume of actions, the portfolio is concentrated within the USPTO, as all matters are assigned to 1 distinct art unit. This suggests that the company's innovations in this space are being evaluated against a very specific set of prior art and examination standards unique to that unit.
The 5 pending office actions are distributed among 4 distinct examiners, indicating a variety of individual tendencies within the single art unit. AMEH, YAOVI M is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently overseeing 2 of the pending office actions. This distribution implies that while the art unit's general policies will apply across the board, the specific outcomes may vary based on the individual perspectives of the 4 distinct examiners involved. Practitioners should note that the concentration in 1 distinct art unit allows for a unified strategy regarding examiner interviews and responses.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (25%) |
| §103 only | 2 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (25%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMEH, YAOVI M | 2 | 91.2% | +7.8% |
| UHLENHAKE, JASON S | 1 | 87.3% | -2.3% |
| DICKERSON, CHAD S | 1 | 62.8% | +23.1% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19001500 | DIGITAL PRINTING PROCESS | AMEH, YAOVI M | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19031927 | DIGITAL PRINTING PROCESS | UHLENHAKE, JASON S | — |
| 19018190 | DIGITAL PRINTING PROCESS AND SYSTEM | AMEH, YAOVI M | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18835038 | Printing marks on substrate edge | DICKERSON, CHAD S | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19031927 | DIGITAL PRINTING PROCESS | UHLENHAKE, JASON S | — | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 18, 2025 |
| 19018190 | DIGITAL PRINTING PROCESS AND SYSTEM | AMEH, YAOVI M | — | §101§103Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 13, 2025 |
| 19001500 | DIGITAL PRINTING PROCESS | AMEH, YAOVI M | — | §103Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 25, 2024 |
| 18835038 | Printing marks on substrate edge | DICKERSON, CHAD S | — | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 01, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial