Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 15, 2026

L&T Technology Services Limited

8 pending office actions • 7 art units • 8 examiners • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 21 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 30 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (50%)
4
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other4 (50%)
§103 only4 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
2
Information Tech
25% of docket
2
Communications
25% of docket
1
Semiconductors
12% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
25% of docket
1
Business / Other
12% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MCANDREW, CHRISTOPHER P 1 85.9% +13.9%
RUSH, ERIC 1 60.5% +36.3%
WORJLOH, JALATEE 1 64.3% +38.0%
LANTZ, KARSTEN FOSTER 1 100.0% +0.0%
SPIELER, WILLIAM 1 73.5% +9.8%
RIVERA, CARLOS A 1 77.2% +29.1%
LULTSCHIK, WILLIAM G 1 22.4% +32.0%
HINCKLEY, CHASE PAUL 1 68.4% +10.4%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18544485 METHOD AND SYSTEM OF EXTRACTING NON-SEMANTIC ENTITIES LANTZ, KARSTEN FOSTER 37d overdue
18811919 INTEGRATED HARDWARE-IN-THE-LOOP (HIL) SYSTEM FOR TESTING HARDWARE DEVICES AND A METHOD THEREOF MCANDREW, CHRISTOPHER P

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17745899 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ANOMALY DETECTION AND REPORT GENERATION HINCKLEY, CHASE PAUL 30d overdue
18230685 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DETECTING FLOOR STAINS USING SURROUND VIEW IMAGES RIVERA, CARLOS A 2d overdue
18531745 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR META-DATA EXTRACTION FROM DOCUMENTS SPIELER, WILLIAM 8d
18209528 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR TRANSMITTING MEDICAL IMAGING DATA LULTSCHIK, WILLIAM G

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17745899 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ANOMALY DETECTION AND REPORT GENERATION HINCKLEY, CHASE PAUL 30d overdue
18230685 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DETECTING FLOOR STAINS USING SURROUND VIEW IMAGES RIVERA, CARLOS A 2d overdue
18811919 INTEGRATED HARDWARE-IN-THE-LOOP (HIL) SYSTEM FOR TESTING HARDWARE DEVICES AND A METHOD THEREOF MCANDREW, CHRISTOPHER P
18605971 METHOD AND SYSTEM OF ANALYSING BLOOD SMEAR IMAGE USING DEEP LEARNING MODEL RUSH, ERIC
18434891 METHOD AND SYSTEM OF COMPRESSING NEURAL NETWORK MODELS BASED ON LEARNABLE MULTI-CRITERIA WORJLOH, JALATEE
18209528 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR TRANSMITTING MEDICAL IMAGING DATA LULTSCHIK, WILLIAM G

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2858 1
2677 1
2664 1
2159 1
3723 1
3682 1
2124 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18811919 INTEGRATED HARDWARE-IN-THE-LOOP (HIL) SYSTEM FOR TESTING HARDWARE DEVICES AND A METHOD THEREOF MCANDREW, CHRISTOPHER P 2858 §103 Final Rejection Pending Aug 22, 2024
18605971 METHOD AND SYSTEM OF ANALYSING BLOOD SMEAR IMAGE USING DEEP LEARNING MODEL RUSH, ERIC 2677 §103 Final Rejection Pending Mar 15, 2024
18434891 METHOD AND SYSTEM OF COMPRESSING NEURAL NETWORK MODELS BASED ON LEARNABLE MULTI-CRITERIA WORJLOH, JALATEE §103 Non-Final OA Pending Feb 07, 2024
18544485 METHOD AND SYSTEM OF EXTRACTING NON-SEMANTIC ENTITIES LANTZ, KARSTEN FOSTER 2664 §103 Non-Final OA 37d overdue Pending Dec 19, 2023
18531745 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR META-DATA EXTRACTION FROM DOCUMENTS SPIELER, WILLIAM 2159 §101§103 Final Rejection 8d Pending Dec 07, 2023
18230685 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DETECTING FLOOR STAINS USING SURROUND VIEW IMAGES RIVERA, CARLOS A 3723 §101§103§112 Final Rejection 2d overdue Pending Aug 07, 2023
18209528 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR TRANSMITTING MEDICAL IMAGING DATA LULTSCHIK, WILLIAM G 3682 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA Pending Jun 14, 2023
17745899 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ANOMALY DETECTION AND REPORT GENERATION HINCKLEY, CHASE PAUL 2124 §101§103 Non-Final OA 30d overdue Pending May 17, 2022

Managing L&T Technology Services Limited's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month