Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Largan Health Ai-Tech Co. Ltd. has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This case is assigned to a distinct examiner, PAULS, JOHN A, who is the busiest examiner for the portfolio. The application is being processed within a distinct art unit, indicating a specific technical classification for the filing. This concentration in both examiner and art unit simplifies the current prosecution tracking for the company.
The pending office action is currently under the review of PAULS, JOHN A, who holds 1 busiest examiner pending action. Because the portfolio is active in only a distinct art unit, the prosecution is highly localized within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems division. This concentration means the company's current patent efforts are focused on a technical review path and an examiner's discretion. This focus allows for direct management of the company's intellectual property interests.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PAULS, JOHN A | 1 | 49.1% | +27.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18951804 | Analysis Module, Analysis System, Electronic Device And Analysis Method | PAULS, JOHN A | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18951804 | Analysis Module, Analysis System, Electronic Device And Analysis Method | PAULS, JOHN A | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3683 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18951804 | Analysis Module, Analysis System, Electronic Device And Analysis Method | PAULS, JOHN A | 3683 | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 19, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial