Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Lateralcare Inc. currently manages a compact patent portfolio within the Computing & Software technology area. The data shows 1 pending office action, which represents the entirety of the company's active prosecution workload. This workload is distributed across 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, indicating a specific technical focus for the pending application. This concentration suggests that the company is currently focusing its resources on a focused intellectual property asset within the computing field.
DANIEL A KUDDUS serves as the busiest examiner for the portfolio, holding the 1 busiest examiner pending action. Since there is only 1 distinct examiner involved, the prosecution process is centralized under this individual's review. This arrangement suggests that the company is not currently navigating the complexities of multiple simultaneous filings or diverse art unit standards. The presence of 1 distinct art unit involved further confirms the narrow scope of the current prosecution activity.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KUDDUS, DANIEL A | 1 | 71.4% | +43.4% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19049518 | METHOD, APPARATUS, AND COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM FOR RETRIEVAL AUGMENTED GENERATION OF OPTIMAL CODING | KUDDUS, DANIEL A | 117d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2154 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19049518 | METHOD, APPARATUS, AND COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM FOR RETRIEVAL AUGMENTED GENERATION OF OPTIMAL CODING | KUDDUS, DANIEL A | 2154 | §103 | Final Rejection | 117d overdue | Pending | Feb 10, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial