Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Laurel Precision Machines Co. Ltd. is managing 2 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These 2 actions are assigned to 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. This means each pending matter is being reviewed by a unique individual in a unique technical department, with no overlap in the current prosecution.
The busiest examiner, DO, TRUC M, is handling 1 pending office action. Since there are 2 pending office actions and 2 distinct examiners, the workload is divided. The use of 2 distinct art units for only 2 actions suggests that the company's Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology is being categorized into different specialized branches. With 2 pending office actions and 2 distinct examiners, the company must manage two separate prosecution tracks within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| §102 only | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| DO, TRUC M | 1 | 82.4% | +6.1% |
| SANDERS, HOWARD J | 1 | 81.1% | +7.8% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18648628 | PAPER SHEET PROCESSING DEVICE | SANDERS, HOWARD J | 5d |
| 19065050 | METHOD FOR CONTROLLING ARTICULATED ROBOT, ROBOT SYSTEM, RECORDING MEDIUM, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING OBJECT | DO, TRUC M | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3658 | 1 |
| 3653 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19065050 | METHOD FOR CONTROLLING ARTICULATED ROBOT, ROBOT SYSTEM, RECORDING MEDIUM, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING OBJECT | DO, TRUC M | 3658 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Feb 27, 2025 |
| 18648628 | PAPER SHEET PROCESSING DEVICE | SANDERS, HOWARD J | 3653 | §102 | Non-Final OA | 5d | Pending | Apr 29, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialLaurel Precision Machines Co. Ltd. has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.
Truc M Do has the most, with 1 of Laurel Precision Machines Co. Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
