Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Ldn Pharma Limited

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Ldn Pharma Limited manages a patent portfolio in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. There are currently 5 pending office actions. This volume indicates a significant amount of active prosecution and a broad engagement with the patent office across multiple pharmaceutical applications.

The portfolio is highly distributed, involving 5 distinct examiners and 5 distinct art units. This one-to-one ratio of 5 pending office actions to 5 distinct examiners suggests that the company's filings cover a wide range of technical topics. Each application is being reviewed in a different administrative environment, requiring a versatile legal strategy to address the specific requirements of each of the 5 distinct art units.

MCMILLIAN, KARA RENITA is identified as the busiest examiner for Ldn Pharma Limited. This examiner is currently handling 1 pending office action. Although designated as the busiest, this examiner only manages 1 of the 5 total pending actions, reflecting the highly decentralized nature of the company's current prosecution efforts across multiple examiners.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (25%)
1
Medium (25%)
2
Easy (50%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (25%)
§112 only1 (25%)
Double-patenting only1 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SAMSELL, RILLA MARIE 1 70.8% +4.6%
VALENROD, YEVGENY 1 72.6% +25.1%
ARNOLD, ERNST V 1 48.2% +12.9%
MOSS, NATALIE M 1 30.8% +17.1%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17435911 METHOD FOR DETERMINING EFFICACY MOSS, NATALIE M 8d overdue

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18273710 NALTREXONE COMPOSITIONS ARNOLD, ERNST V 49d overdue
17435911 METHOD FOR DETERMINING EFFICACY MOSS, NATALIE M 8d overdue
18572651 COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING AN AGONIST OF 5-HYDROXYTRYPTAMINE (5-HT) RECEPTOR SUBTYPE 3 VALENROD, YEVGENY 83d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1624 1
1628 1
1613 1
1653 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18573359 NALTREXONE FOR IMPROVING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF 5-HT RECEPTOR SUBTYPE 2A, 2B or 2C AGONISTS SAMSELL, RILLA MARIE 1624 DP Final Rejection 20d Pending Dec 21, 2023
18572651 COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING AN AGONIST OF 5-HYDROXYTRYPTAMINE (5-HT) RECEPTOR SUBTYPE 3 VALENROD, YEVGENY 1628 §112 Non-Final OA 83d Pending Dec 20, 2023
18273710 NALTREXONE COMPOSITIONS ARNOLD, ERNST V 1613 §103 Non-Final OA 49d overdue Pending Jul 21, 2023
17435911 METHOD FOR DETERMINING EFFICACY MOSS, NATALIE M 1653 §103§112 Non-Final OA 8d overdue Pending Sep 02, 2021

Managing Ldn Pharma Limited's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month