Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Leadoptik Inc.

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Leadoptik Inc. has 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, WOO, JAE KYUN, who is the busiest examiner for the company. The prosecution is taking place within 1 distinct art unit, showing a concentrated effort in this technological field. This arrangement suggests that the company is focusing its current intellectual property strategy on a single, specific innovation within the medical devices sector.

The busiest_examiner_pending count for WOO, JAE KYUN is 1, which accounts for the only pending office action in the portfolio. This suggests that Leadoptik Inc. is currently focused on a single patent application within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector. All current examiner feedback and prosecution strategy are centered on this one individual and art unit. For the practitioner, this means the outcome of the company's current patent efforts depends entirely on the perspective of this specific examiner.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WOO, JAE KYUN 1 59.8% +16.2%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18508852 METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR RECONFIGURABLE OPTICAL ENDOSCOPIC CATHETER WOO, JAE KYUN —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18508852 METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR RECONFIGURABLE OPTICAL ENDOSCOPIC CATHETER WOO, JAE KYUN —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3795 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18508852 METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR RECONFIGURABLE OPTICAL ENDOSCOPIC CATHETER WOO, JAE KYUN 3795 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 14, 2023

Managing Leadoptik Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month