Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days
Leavitt Medical Inc. maintains a patent portfolio in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The company currently has 1 pending office action. This 1 action is situated within 1 distinct art unit, reflecting a specific technical focus within the chemistry field. Prosecution is overseen by 1 distinct examiner.
Christine T Mui is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, with 1 busiest examiner pending action. This 1 action represents the full extent of the company's current pending matters. The concentration in the Chemistry & Materials area suggests that the pending application likely involves chemical compositions or material science relevant to medical applications.
The presence of 1 distinct art unit and 1 distinct examiner allows for a targeted prosecution approach. Practitioners can focus on the specific examination criteria used by Christine T Mui. With 1 pending office action, the administrative burden is low, allowing for a concentrated effort on this outstanding filing in the Chemistry & Materials sector.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MUI, CHRISTINE T | 1 | 78.3% | +19.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18627322 | PATHOLOGICAL SLIDES AND RELATED SYSTEMS AND METHODS | MUI, CHRISTINE T | 3d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18627322 | PATHOLOGICAL SLIDES AND RELATED SYSTEMS AND METHODS | MUI, CHRISTINE T | 3d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1797 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18627322 | PATHOLOGICAL SLIDES AND RELATED SYSTEMS AND METHODS | MUI, CHRISTINE T | 1797 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | 3d overdue | Pending | Apr 04, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial