Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Leclanché SA has 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This action is being reviewed by a distinct examiner in a distinct art unit. The focus of this prosecution activity is contained within this technical domain, requiring interaction with the assigned examiner. Because the portfolio currently involves a distinct art unit, the legal strategy can be tailored to the standards of that specific chemistry-focused group. This allows for a specific approach to addressing the pending requirements of the patent office.
KOPEC, MARK T is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, with 1 pending office action under review. This figure matches the total number of pending office actions for the company. For the practitioner, this means that the progress of the pending office action is determined by the review of KOPEC, MARK T. This workload structure identifies the primary point of contact for the company's active patent applications.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KOPEC, MARK T | 1 | 84.5% | +12.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18841596 | A SLURRY, AN ELECTRODE, AND A METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING AN ELECTRODE FOR LITHIUM-ION BATTERIES | KOPEC, MARK T | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18841596 | A SLURRY, AN ELECTRODE, AND A METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING AN ELECTRODE FOR LITHIUM-ION BATTERIES | KOPEC, MARK T | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1762 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18841596 | A SLURRY, AN ELECTRODE, AND A METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING AN ELECTRODE FOR LITHIUM-ION BATTERIES | KOPEC, MARK T | 1762 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 26, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialLeclanché SA has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Mark T Kopec has the most, with 1 of Leclanché SA's pending office actions.
Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
