Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Leer Group LLC maintains a patent portfolio in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. There is currently 1 pending office action associated with this portfolio. This figure represents the current level of active engagement with the patent office. For a practitioner, this indicates that the company's immediate legal focus is directed toward a single pending matter.
The prosecution involves a distinct examiner and a single art unit. This indicates that the company's mechanical and e-commerce innovations are being processed through a single channel at the USPTO. MORROW, JASON S is listed as the busiest examiner for the company. The use of a single art unit suggests a consistent technical evaluation of the company's intellectual property.
MORROW, JASON S is currently managing 1 busiest examiner pending office action. With only a single pending action overall, the prosecution strategy is entirely dependent on the interactions with MORROW, JASON S. Practitioners should account for the singular nature of this review process when planning future filings or responses within the transportation and mechanical systems sector.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MORROW, JASON S | 1 | 84.3% | +10.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18099578 | Truck Bedslide Assembly | MORROW, JASON S | 57d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18099578 | Truck Bedslide Assembly | MORROW, JASON S | 57d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3612 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18099578 | Truck Bedslide Assembly | MORROW, JASON S | 3612 | §102§112Other | Non-Final OA | 57d | Pending | Jan 20, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial