Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Leer Inc. has 2 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These 2 actions are assigned to 2 distinct examiners and are located within 1 distinct art unit. This indicates that both applications are being reviewed by the same specialized group, though by different individuals. The concentration in 1 distinct art unit suggests that the company's mechanical systems technology is currently being examined under a single set of art unit specific guidelines for the 2 pending office actions.
GOYEA, OLUSEGUN is the busiest examiner, responsible for 1 pending office action. With 2 distinct examiners for 2 pending office actions, the workload is evenly split between them. For the practitioner, this means managing 2 separate examiner relationships within the same art unit. Even with only 2 pending office actions, the focus on 1 distinct art unit allows the company to tailor its arguments to the specific technical standards and precedents of that single specialized group. The workload of 1 pending office action for GOYEA, OLUSEGUN is the standard for this company.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (50%) |
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GOYEA, OLUSEGUN | 1 | 64.9% | +33.3% |
| RACIC, MILENA | 1 | 47.9% | +44.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19222856 | MERCHANDISER WITH ON-PRODUCT FINANCIAL PAYMENT SYSTEM | GOYEA, OLUSEGUN | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18767597 | MERCHANDISER WITH SENSING CAPABILITIES | RACIC, MILENA | 23d |
| 19222856 | MERCHANDISER WITH ON-PRODUCT FINANCIAL PAYMENT SYSTEM | GOYEA, OLUSEGUN | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3627 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19222856 | MERCHANDISER WITH ON-PRODUCT FINANCIAL PAYMENT SYSTEM | GOYEA, OLUSEGUN | — | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 29, 2025 |
| 18767597 | MERCHANDISER WITH SENSING CAPABILITIES | RACIC, MILENA | 3627 | §103 | Final Rejection | 23d | Pending | Jul 09, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial