Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Lenard Enterprises Inc. operates a patent portfolio in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The portfolio currently has 1 pending office action. This indicates a focused prosecution effort for their mechanical and e-commerce assets, with a single application currently requiring active legal attention.
The prosecution is concentrated with 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This structure suggests that the company's current filings are situated within a specific technical niche. A focus on 1 distinct art unit allows for a more streamlined approach to managing examiner communications and expectations, as the practitioner only deals with one set of administrative guidelines.
ABULABAN, ABDALLAH is the busiest examiner for this portfolio. This examiner is responsible for the 1 pending office action currently on record. The outcome of this pending matter will depend entirely on the review conducted by this specific examiner, making their individual prosecution history a key factor for the company.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ABULABAN, ABDALLAH | 1 | 71.0% | +14.1% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18392318 | Methods and Systems for Determining an Operation State of Acoustic Transducers | ABULABAN, ABDALLAH | 81d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3645 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18392318 | Methods and Systems for Determining an Operation State of Acoustic Transducers | ABULABAN, ABDALLAH | 3645 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 81d overdue | Pending | Dec 21, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial